of course there's no "possible" way, it was a divine act. Do you think God came down and slept with Mary or something or injected a sperm missle into her gut?
Well, that IS how Herakles was born by Zeus and Alkaleme, or Vali the Avenger by Odin and some princess. The old polytheistic gods were, after all, very human. I suppose that is what makes Christianity different. That, and the fact that Jesus is not made but co-eternal with the Father, not greater nor lesser, not seperate yet distinct. The same could not be said of Vidar, or Herakles, or Perseus, or Sarpedon, or any other children of the gods in old myths.
As far as I know, Christianity is the only religion to deify it's prophet. And since you know the most theology on this board, what is your opinion, accepting that immaculate conception occured: Sexual or asexual reproduction? Bearing in mind that intercourse needn't actually take place for reproduction to be considered sexual.
Hmmm... a difficult thing to answer. I should have to go with the Creed, which says 'conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary', thus being sexual, if anything.
And Christianity does not deify its prophet, for it does not believe that Jesus was a prophet at all. Some held him to be so in his time, citing him even to be Elijah reborn perhaps. That is the question posed to Peter: who do you say I am? To which Peter replies that he is the Christ, the Son of God. Essentially, though, unless one ascribes to the Arian belief, held to be heretical by all the rest of the Church - and the refutation of being the subject of the council at Nicea - Jesus is not some seperate entity. He IS God, true God, not some spirit born of God, or sent by God.