People can't justify something without looking at the evidence. For your own interest, i'm asking you from everything that you've said about Crono and co being untouchable, superior that they can't be killed etc to justify it with evidence that does not include the battle system, since I've already given enough evidence to why they cannot be immortal.
I've put in bold the parts here that I've never, to my recollection, ever said.
First off, I never said they were untouchable, nor did I say that they were unkillable, and I certainly never said they were immortal.
While, yes; I do use Lavos to justify my point of them being tough to kill, I've never claimed them to be invincible. I choose to believe they are alive, as they managed to defeat something that could destroy the world, I'm not using the battle system to justify that, I'm using the
plot to justify it. I just don't think they would've died in the fall of Guardia, I acknowledge that, yes, they can be killed; however I choose to believe that they did not, and I've used evidence (many times in fact) such as Lucca's letter seemingly referring to them in the present tense, etc. To justify my claim. On the other hand, all you have done is throw theories at me and use real life examples (such as getting shot), which clearly don't apply to any form of fiction (see: magic) as justification that they did.
Yes, you're right, Lucca may be dead, but she may not, none of us can say for sure. All you keep arguing is that I say they are unkillable. Guess what Mr. "School-Debating-Team," thats what we call a Straw-Man argument, you're substituting my argument for one that is easily disprovable (i.e that I am "saying" that they're unkillable and/or immortal) and attacking me on that, that isn't a valid argument. If you're going to try and flaunt your debating creditenials, at least use proper techniques and arguments, not this Jr. High stuff.
Masato himself inclined that Crono and Marle perished in the Fall of Guardia, and we already know that Lucca died. It doesn't matter how, the point is that any who believe that Crono and Lucca and Marle are invincible only through comparison to Lavos are clearly going in circles.
Firstly, you mean to say implied I assume, not inclined, unless Masato likes to believe they died, which I suppose is possible. We don't "know" that Lucca died, unless you are somehow privilaged to special knowledge that nobody else has at all. Its sort of implied, but as shown in many other games, implication != fact.
You can't just throw away my own theory when I've asked a question. And then say that i'm being hostile. You're the ones mocking me, when you can't even answer a question.
Yes, I am mocking you a very small amount at this point, but I'm not throwing away your theory. They could've died, I don't deny that, but I'm (in your own words) rebutting your argument by providing evidence and trying to build a case off of that. What did you write, right at the end?
But since you think that didn't happen, and that they're almost omnipotent, you still can't explain why Crono died and Lucca can die. Robo may not have a body, but he was still deleted.
hmm... Oh, and what is this "question" that you refer to, because I'm pretty sure that it was answered, but give it a shot anyway.
Also, I'm not flaming. What kind of insinuation is this? There's a difference between openly congratulating someone on "destryong someones comments" when there is nothing to prove that I myself am wrong and simply trying to rebuttle your argument.
Perhaps that was the wrong word to pick then, how does hostily attacking points that weren't made rather than the actual in game evidence that we've been attempting to provide sound? Not much better I suspect, but its not saying flaming right?
If you want to debate, make it constructive rather than smart ass please, thanks. (and yes, I know that this post is rather smart ass, but I've already stated my arguments earlier in this thread; when you start debating me on actual points I've chosen, then I'll give you a rebuttal on that, theres no point now).