Author Topic: Why should Crono Cross even be considered as a sequel?  (Read 5988 times)

Zaperking

  • Radical Dreamer (+2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 2210
    • View Profile
Why should Crono Cross even be considered as a sequel?
« Reply #45 on: February 05, 2006, 04:56:17 am »
Quote from: Sentenal
Quote from: Zaperking
Quote from: Sentenal
I say "give up, you loose" on behalf of the defeated, Zaper.  I'm trying to get the defeated party to stop where they are in their arguement before they discredit themselves anymore.


I'm agreeing that it's a sequal, you nut. >.>

I wasn't telling you to give up, you were on the right side, I was telling him to give up, you nut.  :)


Oo, I missed the , lol. I thought you were saying it "on behalf of the defeated Zaperking" tehehe :P

Legend of the Past

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1679
    • View Profile
Why should Crono Cross even be considered as a sequel?
« Reply #46 on: February 05, 2006, 01:52:06 pm »
, is called a coma, but yeah. Anyway, I hope this is the last reply on the topic. Let's let it rest in peace!

AuraTwilight

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1524
    • View Profile
Why should Crono Cross even be considered as a sequel?
« Reply #47 on: February 05, 2006, 05:38:37 pm »
Comma. Not coma. Sheesh, grammar must be in one of those to allow itself to be butchered like this.

ChronoMagus

  • Chronopolitan (+300)
  • *
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
Why should Crono Cross even be considered as a sequel?
« Reply #48 on: February 05, 2006, 08:05:56 pm »
Despite the fact that Legend talked about a medical state instead of a gramatical convention, we should follow the post and not reply!!