Poll

What inappropriate object would YOU plug into your car's hydrogen tank?

An electrical power cord
3 (15%)
Dick Cheney's pacemaker
3 (15%)
The world's last N-Gage
2 (10%)
Maine
2 (10%)
8 billion dollars, shrink-wrapped, on pallets
3 (15%)
Last shred of respect for democracy
5 (25%)
Alan Mullaly, the fucker
2 (10%)

Total Members Voted: 19

Author Topic: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)  (Read 5081 times)

Kyronea

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1913
    • View Profile
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #30 on: April 10, 2007, 09:40:42 pm »

This isn't a flimsy formal debate with goals of winning some judge's points. This is a duel of perspectives. Sometimes these things get a little heated; it's only natural. I'll save my apologies and concessions for after things cool down and my vision returns, because I know if I push this as far as it goes, there's something to be gained from the experience.

Fair enough, Ramsus. Fair enough. I just thought it was getting personal and I sought to intercede lest we have something that cause a fissure between you two, which would not exactly have been a good thing.

Burning Zeppelin

  • God of War (+3000)
  • *
  • Posts: 3137
    • View Profile
    • Delicate Cutters
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #31 on: April 10, 2007, 09:59:56 pm »
Man, hydrogen cars are gonna be fricken sweet.

Ramsus

  • Guest
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #32 on: April 10, 2007, 10:09:07 pm »

This isn't a flimsy formal debate with goals of winning some judge's points. This is a duel of perspectives. Sometimes these things get a little heated; it's only natural. I'll save my apologies and concessions for after things cool down and my vision returns, because I know if I push this as far as it goes, there's something to be gained from the experience.

Fair enough, Ramsus. Fair enough. I just thought it was getting personal and I sought to intercede lest we have something that cause a fissure between you two, which would not exactly have been a good thing.

In a way, it is personal. It always has been and always will be, but no matter how stupid either of us get (and I know I get pretty stupid at times...), I'll still respect the guy.

In fact, Josh is one of the few people here I actually respect, mostly because he'll actually speak his mind and give a strong opinion. I trust that when he says something, he really means it. That's why he's an admin.

Win or lose, even if he tore me apart in an argument or debate and completely humiliated me, I wouldn't hold it against him one bit after it's all said and done. Hell, I'd probably be a better person for it. I've got at least that much maturity, and I'm pretty sure he has more than enough to put up with me. Otherwise, he would have already torched the site's forums or something...

Ramsus

  • Guest
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #33 on: April 10, 2007, 10:14:28 pm »
Man, hydrogen cars are gonna be fricken sweet.

It'd be sweeter if you didn't need a car to get around cheaply and efficiently to begin with. If you think about it, the problem isn't our gasoline dependence so much as our car dependence.

That's why idiots like Bush supporting barely effective alternative fuels aren't helping solve anything.

Zakyrus

  • Entity
  • Magical Dreamer (+1250)
  • *
  • Posts: 1359
  • "Bouncy, bouncy, bouncy... --!!"
    • View Profile
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #34 on: April 11, 2007, 01:40:59 am »
This completely does not surprise me one bit.  :lol:

Daniel Krispin

  • Guest
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #35 on: April 11, 2007, 03:42:08 am »
Man, hydrogen cars are gonna be fricken sweet.

It'd be sweeter if you didn't need a car to get around cheaply and efficiently to begin with. If you think about it, the problem isn't our gasoline dependence so much as our car dependence.

What do you suggest as an alternative? Better public transit? Just curious.

ChronoKiD

  • Earthbound (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #36 on: April 11, 2007, 04:28:43 am »
Man, hydrogen cars are gonna be fricken sweet.

It'd be sweeter if you didn't need a car to get around cheaply and efficiently to begin with. If you think about it, the problem isn't our gasoline dependence so much as our car dependence.

What do you suggest as an alternative? Better public transit? Just curious.

"instant transmission... " lolz :lol:

Lord J Esq

  • Moon Stone J
  • Hero of Time (+5000)
  • *
  • Posts: 5463
  • ^_^ "Ayla teach at college level!!"
    • View Profile
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #37 on: April 11, 2007, 05:33:41 am »
...

What the hell is wrong with you two? Why are you getting so upset over one little issue about a freaking hydrogen car? You're acting as if your careers are on the line here or something, and frankly both of you are stubbornly holding opinions you just won't let go. I would suggest you both calm down...arguing like this is not a good debate strategy.

Like Ramsus said, it's more like a sparring session than a flame war. You can ask Ramsus what he gets out of it. For me, the attraction is to make an argument to a stubborn, aggressive opponent and see what I can learn. A while back his nastiness was kind of repugnant, but when I learned that he turns it off like a spigot outside of the argument and is actually a decent guy, I began to get a lot of "meta" out of the occasional spat with him.

Meta? By that I mean personality cues, interpersonal tactical feedback, that sort of thing: It helps me to understand people better. I also learn more about argument...although as you can see I didn't apply those lessons here. Doing homework takes time and energy, and with Ramsus it's usually not worth the trouble because he's so stubborn and I don't actually argue with him anymore with the expectation of winning. Instead, it's all a real-life learning exercise. The actual substance of the debate wasn't even relevant in this case--although it sometimes will be. In fact, Keith Olbermann mostly debunked this whole story shortly after it came out. (Had Ramsus done his homework, he would have found that out pretty quickly and socked it to me. Luckily, he is as lazy as he is brutish.) Were it just about the substance, I could care less about defending my position and probably would have folded my cards. Because I have a lot of engineering know-how, I knew right away that I couldn't make a decisive argument without looking at the technical details--the outlet, etc. Then again, with Ramsus even had I made an invincible argument, he probably still would have kept on fighting. Most people don't know how to concede...or don't care to.

I made a strong argument, given the cards I was dealt. I pressed hard on the fact that Mulally's actions paint the picture of a serious incident involving near-averted disaster. Implicit in that is the assumption of an ethical and thorough reporting job, a risky assumption that I was prepared to concede upon had Ramsus come up with proof (rather than hearsay) that the story was bogus. Also, I used my technical know-how to fight on the point of the danger of mixing electricity and compressed hydrogen. Lastly--which he never seemed to appreciate--I left Ramsus an instant "mutual win" button by agreeing early on that, in saying Bush "almost" blew himself up, I wasn't prepared to quantify how close "almost" actually was.

An open-minded opponent probably would have either beaten me legitimately, or sought to compromise once he or she recognized I wasn't blindly buying in to the latest Bush bash. Ramsus, bless him, chose ego-driven tactics. He probably knows he can't beat me with egotistical fallacies, rhetorical flourishes, and sheer force of presence, and he definitely didn't know that I have extensive knowledge on the subjects of both engineering and journalism (to his misfortune), but he did know that he was not happy with what I was saying, and he chose to keep on fighting. I chose to keep on fighting too--although I'm finished now, my smarmy scam having been exposed in this little documentary post.

I'm just a few months shy of 25. I was arguing on forums before most of you learned how to write, let alone write compellingly. When it comes to online message board fights, I have been there and done that. Plus, my ego is way too huge to be satisfied with the fawning adorations of a few bumbling message board idiots. Thus, I am generally not the sort of person who gets drawn into pointless and petty forum spats any longer. When I might seem to, you should reasonably expect that I have other motives. So, your concern is appreciated Kyronea, but don't worry about me.

As for you, Ramsus, I concede. You win. Then again, you're late. I won a number of posts back. =)

Kyronea

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1913
    • View Profile
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #38 on: April 11, 2007, 05:47:17 am »
And, as I said to Ramsus, fair enough, Lord J. Seems I stumbled into something here that has a much greater history to it than I was led to believe by this one thread. It was my fault for not recognizing this and backing down...instead I chose to confront. I apologize to the both of you for my out of turn statements.

Lord J Esq

  • Moon Stone J
  • Hero of Time (+5000)
  • *
  • Posts: 5463
  • ^_^ "Ayla teach at college level!!"
    • View Profile
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #39 on: April 11, 2007, 06:08:27 am »
*Force choke*

Apology accepted.

Burning Zeppelin

  • God of War (+3000)
  • *
  • Posts: 3137
    • View Profile
    • Delicate Cutters
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #40 on: April 11, 2007, 07:29:26 am »
It'd be sweeter if you didn't need a car to get around cheaply and efficiently to begin with. If you think about it, the problem isn't our gasoline dependence so much as our car dependence.
Ah, the ol' "back to the bicycle era" solution.

Ramsus

  • Guest
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #41 on: April 11, 2007, 09:07:57 am »
It doesn't really matter if I was mostly right about the article, because I was wrong too many ways to really "win" anything. Sometimes it takes me a while to refine my ideas on something and figure out what I really want to say (especially now that this intense language course I'm in is scrambling my head), so by the end of an argument, I don't even agree with half the things I've already posted.

But that alone makes arguing worthwhile. Even if you embarrass yourself, it's only because you have some weaknesses -- whether its in the way you think or look at news or even if it's just finding out that the way you say something doesn't come across properly to some people -- so you can learn from the experience and refine the way you think about and explain things.

For example, I tend to be overly reliant on catchy rhetoric (you have to admit, it's a very powerful crutch), while Josh writes too densely for most people to absorb the bulk of his posts.  This gives me something of a perceived advantage to others, but I can count on Josh not to let up because of that. No, he'll stick it out, pierce right through it, and make me think about what I'm saying.

Honestly though, half of what he says doesn't sink in until after I've replied. You really have to read his posts very carefully at times. Sometimes the excess in words is unwarranted, but sometimes he's really saying a lot more than it seems.

Man, hydrogen cars are gonna be fricken sweet.

It'd be sweeter if you didn't need a car to get around cheaply and efficiently to begin with. If you think about it, the problem isn't our gasoline dependence so much as our car dependence.

What do you suggest as an alternative? Better public transit? Just curious.

I'm still fleshing this idea out, but I think it's where things will eventually end up out of sheer economics.

Lately, I'm thinking we should start building the infrastructure today for a better public transportation tomorrow, instead of subsidizing stopgap solutions that'll let us hold out on keeping our every man every car society intact. The few times you'd really need a car, you could rent one, and I imagine in a society where most people use such transportation, some extremely cheap services for moving goods would pop up to help people move heavy stuff around.

I know from personal experience the very design of cities back in Oklahoma would make it damn near impossible for any public transportation to be easy and convenient though. As long as you need a car to conveniently and cheaply just get around, everyone will own one.

So back in Oklahoma the only real solution after oil prices shoot through the roof (right now is nothing) is switching to electric cars and building some nuclear power plants. Solar and wind would work well there, but I'd hold out on cheaper solar panel technologies -- preferably something that looks good as a type of roofing.
« Last Edit: April 11, 2007, 10:24:11 am by Ramsus »

Ramsus

  • Guest
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #42 on: April 11, 2007, 09:28:09 am »
And, as I said to Ramsus, fair enough, Lord J. Seems I stumbled into something here that has a much greater history to it than I was led to believe by this one thread. It was my fault for not recognizing this and backing down...instead I chose to confront. I apologize to the both of you for my out of turn statements.

You're one of those compromising, mediator types, aren't you? You don't have to apologize for everything, especially not for acting on your own nature. Relax a little, and be more confident with your own opinions.

Hell, if you grow a thick enough skin and can stand getting batted around a bit, you're welcome to jump right into these arguments as much as you want. It complicates things to argue on multiple fronts, but it's also more exciting... though if you don't feel like it, I understand. Most people wouldn't jump between a tiger and a bear.

Silvercry

  • Enlightened One (+200)
  • *
  • Posts: 241
    • View Profile
    • The Great Silvercry's Blog
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #43 on: April 11, 2007, 12:28:33 pm »
"Who is more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows him?"
-Obi Wan Kenobi

Lord J Esq

  • Moon Stone J
  • Hero of Time (+5000)
  • *
  • Posts: 5463
  • ^_^ "Ayla teach at college level!!"
    • View Profile
Re: Bush Nearly Blows Himself Up (Not Kidding)
« Reply #44 on: April 11, 2007, 04:06:05 pm »
The fool!

Wait...is this a trick question?

As regards transit infrastructure, unfortunately the American Way is our greatest enemy in truly evolving the way people move around. This country grew up with huge regions of empty land, artificially cheap gasoline, and a growing sense of entitlement to freedom for freedom's sake. ("I'm a taxpaying citizen, dammit, my SUV can get fifty gallons to the mile for all I care, and god help the government cog who stands in my way!" (Especially if they do so with a Geo Metro.))

Those of you who have been in Europe or Asia probably know this firsthand; cars in the States are huge. They are monstrously big. There's no reason for it. You can fit two adults, two kids, and luggage for a vacation in a small car (I know 'cause we used to do it!). SUVs were the technological blunder of the 1990s.

Gas prices in the States are artificially low, both directly and indirectly. Gas taxes in particular are way too low, giving people the ability to drive any distance at any time without giving their fuel costs a second thought. When prices spiked a couple years back, the politicians were all talking about how to relieve the pressure, because it would have been political suicide to come out and say the truth: Gas taxes need to go up.

All that land the United States owns--and this is particularly true west of the Mississippi--has given rise to a feeling of entitlement. We all want to have a big house on a five-acre lot ten miles outside the hustle and bustle of the city. This is called suburban sprawl. And because we can afford the gasoline, it continues unabated, leading to the destruction of ecosystems and a considerable increase in our non-utilized greenhouse gas output. (That's "traffic jams," folks.)

The internal combustion engine was one of the greatest inventions ever, but in this century it has become a menace from within...and we have to dissociate ourselves from it. We must put a financial burden on owning inefficiently large private vehicles. In the beginning, gas taxes must go up. Mass transit infrastructure--especially in the West--must become a public funding priority. We must begin to acknowledge as a people that driving single-occupancy should be the exception and not the rule to our transit needs. We must provide financial incentives to living in populated areas and financial and legal disincentives to sprawl. And we must do it soon, or the consequences to our environment will be all the worse and the habits will be all the harder to give up.

But it won't happen that way. The American Way is too potent a mindset in our culture. Instead, we will evolve by necessity--not by intent. And that puts America in a more serious jeopardy than most people comprehend: Waiting for a crisis to come to us, rather than tackling it before it reaches critical mass, leaves the future uncertain. America might not come out of this on top of the world scene. And frankly, given the stakes, the entire world might end up becoming a vastly different place. I don't think you need me to tell you how horrifying and angering it is to hear of so many species at the top of the evolutionary tree going extinct, to hear of whole ecosystems collapsing, to see (on a recent trip) a permanent smog cover the desert where I grew up, and all the rest of it.

Energy policy should be our single top issue in this country, because it covers all the essential stuff from national security to environmental protection to infrastructural development. I don't actually think hydrogen cars are the future...but it's a step in the right direction.