You have to be open about this shit, I believe a"direct sequel" has familiar playable characters. Kinda like ff7 compilation.
T Rod you said it. I don't see how CC is a sequal because it basically has nothing to do with CT. I have never played it but watched walkthroughs and read multiple reviews from gamefaqs.com and while it looks fun I would be lying to myself by saying it's a true sequal.
I don't recall any mention of a "Direct Sequel" in the post I was responding to - It was specifically said that Cross is not a "True Sequel", and that's what I was talking about.
I don't see how CC is a sequal because it basically has nothing to do with CT. I have never played it
I said it was a direct sequel, yeah, but the entire point of my post was to show the error in this statement here.
That being said, you can get all technical with the term "Direct Sequel" all you want, but that isn't going to change the fact that Cross is the ONLY sequel for Trigger (Made by SE, anyway). Arguing the fact that it's the sequel to CT is futile. SE said it was, it says so on the back cover on the game, and it has a massive amount of references and answers as to "What happened after CT?". Not only that, but how can ANYONE say that it's not a true sequel if they, quote, "have never played it"?
I'm not going to be open in any way, shape or form as to the argument to whether or not Cross is the sequel to Trigger, it IS THE SEQUEL, THE ONLY SEQUEL.
...and certainly on a top 20 of my favorite RPGs of all time.
if chrono cross is on your top 20 list, that's not saying much. unless you've played 5000 rpgs.
I have played a massive amount of RPGs, it's really the only game genre I play. I see your point here, though, allow me to rephrase a bit:
"Chrono Cross is one of my top 5 favorite RPGs for the PS1."
Better? =P
Xenogears is better, though. =P