Yes, Acacia Sgt understands what I mean.
But, Wazuki is Lynx correct. And he entered the Sea of Edan before 1010AD. Therefore time travel. FATE on the other hand could still exist if everything is reset then she never died instead, Lynx would be gone because of TTI as well as Miguel and Serge.
I think you still misunderstand me and Eske's position just a little bit. We concluded that all instances of TTI/TB before 1010 AD would be preserved. TTI doesn't make individuals disappear, Time Bastard does. Because Serge and Wazuki/Lynx first entered the Sea of Eden and then exited it, they would first disappear due to TB and then reappear shortly thereafter due to TTI. Neither of them did any more time travelling until after 1010 AD, which is important because:
We also concluded that time travel events that occurred in one dimension, but
not the other, would not be preserved in the unified timeline because it would cause irreconcilable problems. Take my Vann example above, and you can apply it to every instance of time travel that did not occur in the same way in both dimensions after 1010 AD. Now, in my Vann example above, if both Vann X and Vann Y time travelled at the same time in their respectives dimensions, then there would be no problem with Vann XY disappearing at that time in the Ideal Timeline after 1010 AD due to TB. See? It's only when one time travels but
not the other that problems arise.
As such, because there is only one Serge - he will never disappear due to TB after 1010 AD. And because Wazuki/Lynx did not time travel at the same time in both dimensions (ie: He crossed the Dead Sea boundary first in Home World and then the Sea of Eden in Another later on) he likewise will not disappear. The same goes for Harle and for every single one of the playable characters.
Everything After 1010 is reset so the death of fate and all of it. But assuming the Gate is still created, FATE no longer has any recollection of Lynx. And the Frozen Flame in the future is open to FATE. I mean why wouldn't FATE exist if everything was reset?
As Acacia Sgt said, FATE exists in the future and not the past. Everything after 1010 AD is indeed reset, including the death of FATE by Serge - you are correct about that. But if FATE doesn't exist in the first place in the new timeline, then she doesn't have to die.
You can view the boundary of the Sea of Eden as a boundary of space/time. 2400 AD became connected physically to 12,000 BC. This has an equivalent effect to a normal time gate that is just open all of the time. So take this hypothetical example:
A time Gate is open between 1000 AD and 600 AD and it stays open all of the time. Person A exists in 1000 AD, and Person B exists in 600 AD. Person B goes through the time gate and kills Person A - then he returns to 600 AD. Person A stays there the entire time in 1000 AD and never existed in 600 AD, but Person B can still meet and kill Person A just fine.
Now what if some time travelling event alters that timeline so that Person A never exists in the first place? Person B would appear there but never meet Person A.
This is an analagous example to FATE existing within the Sea of Eden.