Oh, for crying out loud...
Squeenix's behaviour in this has nothing to do with logic and everything to do with the way
corporate policy with regards to IP operates in America. Their thinking runs something like
this:
1. We own this IP, or think we do.
2. While we own it, there may be some possibility, however unlikely, that we could make
money off it.
3. Therefore, we must hold on to it in a death grip even if we have no current use for it.
Keep in mind that if any large corporation were human, it would be considered psychotic.
Squeenix will cheerfully lie, cheat and steal to do what its executives have been taught is
in the corporation's best interests: holding on to property at all costs. It is not
sane behaviour, and the only way to argue with it is in court.
@MKnance: Because it doesn't matter what's in the readme. Squeenix can still sue even
if they know they're in the wrong, and even if they lose the suit, the time and money
of the people who fought them won't be given back.
(In case people hadn't guessed, seeing this damned topic resurrected over and over again
is getting on my nerves.)