yes i did, and that's been corrected.
If I may ask, how does Ct show that there is no beginning? I'm under the impression that it does imply that there is a beginning, but even regardless that location of that area is dubbed its name by Gaspar, and as human tradition, what the finding occupant tends to call a place, tends to stick. As mentioned, it does have a tangible existence through our measurements of calculated devices, by which there aren't any at said location, therefore your 'logical points' are not necessary for the name, or influences by which the name came to be, of place known as 'the end of time'.
Also I could qualify your statement with time having no currently known tangible existence. But, then again, said a qualification would also void your chain anyway and give purpose to the End signifying a Beginning. Regardless, non of that probably has any impact on there being a 'beginning of time' because such a place doesn't effect the story or events of the game. The beginnings, that is being plural, that do matter, are indeed there.