Very few people are of the mustache twirling, Dick Cheney type.
And yet, oddly enough, O' Dicky supports same-sex marriage. Even the mustache twirling, Dick Cheney types aren't totally without a shred of humanity.
The problem with that is that many people see Christianity as an inherently sexist religion..
Not the Romans, though. One of the main complaints about Christianity back in the day (the first few centuries C.E.) was that they treated women and slaves like equals. This did, admittedly, change over time, particularly as Christianity began to be turned into an ossified religious structure.
But as much as I would like to, I won’t go into a long defense of religion (and trust me, I can be
very long; Lord J can attest to this). There is a little known, 8th deadly sin: the sin of sidetracking a very important topic with a non-sequiter discussion on religion as a whole.
Let me propose that in this case, religion is a red herring. If Josh is right and religion is naught but bunk, then all the sins of religion are the sins of humanity, all the faults of religion are the faults of humanity. Addressing sexism in religion, under such an assumption, just addresses as single symptom of the sexism that is part of humanity itself; it ignores the underlying cause(s). Faust asked the question of what motivates men to support the sex-slavery industry. The answer to that question does not lie within religion.
One of the really disturbing things about that article that you linked to, Sajainta, is how under-the-radar the sex-trafficking industry is (certainly not the only really disturbing thing; that article had a lot). It is quite possible that I've seen a young girl being transported to another hellful experience on the New Jersey Turnpike, or that a "father" I passed at Disneyland is really going to commit a crime against humanity.
Then there are the stories about sexual abuse in general, like the father in
Australia who sired four children with his daughter. Even if the sex-trade industry evaporates overnight, people like this would remain.
I would like to bring your attention to the neighbor of the man:
One neighbour told the paper that she had suspicions about the man for at least four years but took no action because she did not want to interfere.
"I didn't go to anybody because it wasn't anybody's business," she said, accusing the woman who encouraged the victim to report the crime of being a "busybody".
Until humanity can figure out what is causing individuals to engage in sexually abusive activities, this highlights a good way we can all help the situation: Get to know your neighbors.
America has largely turned into an isolated society. How many of us can say we know our neighbors well? What about the other people on your street? The clerk at the grocery store? Etc. A house on your street might really be infested with the scum of humanity, but how would you know? Our isolation allows activities like this to continue. Ignorance doesn't wash us of blame, it only makes our fault worse.
Now I'm not saying we should all turn into sex-spies; rather, just take an interest in your fellow humans, those that are right outside your door. And, of course, if something’s f'ed up, take action. But if every person who didn't engage in the sex-trade made an effort to get to know their neighbors, that would make America a much harder place to conduct "business" of this sort.