Author Topic: Why Crono?  (Read 36234 times)

Zaperking

  • Radical Dreamer (+2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 2210
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #255 on: August 07, 2005, 05:16:36 am »
I not with Kazmaka >.<

kazmaka

  • Enlightened One (+200)
  • *
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #256 on: August 07, 2005, 06:07:11 am »
Quote from: DeweyisOverrated
Janus and Magus can't be the same person.  Let me explain.

Schala = Kino.  Since Schala and Janus were siblings, this means they must have been sent to the same time period.  Magus came from 600 AD, so he can't be Janus, since Janus was sent with Schala/Kino to 65 million BC.  

So what hapenned to Janus?  Simple.  He's Ayla.  And you may be asking, "Well Ayla's a girl, how can this be?"  Simple.  Ayla is obviously more manly than her husband, Kino, who is actually quite girly.  Which makes perfect sense, because Schala IS kino!

So, explain to me, if Janus is really Ayla, how Janus could possibly be Magus?


you must be high  :roll:

Quote
person n. 1. Any human being considered as a distinct entity or personality; an individual.

Magus is so hard to distinct from Janus in a way. The first time I saw Magus and Janus, I was like WTF. I guessed that Magus was the profit, but not Janus, even if the name pointed it out, and same with Crono and co, they didn't know till he told them.

Quote
And kazmaka, if you don't understand what the word "entity" means, thats fine with me.


dude, dont be a retard.

Quote
You win the boobie prize for the most idiotic thing I've ever read in the ENTIRE HISTORY of the Compendium! And that includes that one Gato fanfic w/Jhonny


hey who started the fight? sentenal if i remember corectly, and its hardly idiotic, sentenal was proving a point, me and zapper were proving him wrong, how is that idiotic? the means we went about it where wholly sentenals fault.

V_Translanka

  • Interim Global Moderator
  • Arbiter (+8000)
  • *
  • Posts: 8340
  • Destroyer of Worlds
    • View Profile
    • http://www.angelfire.com/weird2/v_translanka/
Why Crono?
« Reply #257 on: August 07, 2005, 07:29:34 am »
1. who's "fighting"?
2. telling someone to 'just give up' is retarded
3. there is no WINNING in theorizing for god's sake...it's not like we're on opposing sides of a game or something...
4. if someone can't or won't accept your theories, that is not the end of the world, nor does it make you inferrior...don't take counter-theories or attacks on the theories you create as personal attacks.

And that is an example of the obvious bullshit I have to point out because of CE :cry: hurry up and get done w/it already! I'm beggin' yas!

kazmaka

  • Enlightened One (+200)
  • *
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #258 on: August 07, 2005, 08:23:24 am »
Quote from: V_Translanka
1. who's "fighting"?
2. telling someone to 'just give up' is retarded
3. there is no WINNING in theorizing for god's sake...it's not like we're on opposing sides of a game or something...
4. if someone can't or won't accept your theories, that is not the end of the world, nor does it make you inferrior...don't take counter-theories or attacks on the theories you create as personal attacks.

And that is an example of the obvious bullshit I have to point out because of CE :cry: hurry up and get done w/it already! I'm beggin' yas!


i wouldnt of called this a debate, i thought it was sentenal saying not to take things literally, and me and zaper saying why not, im not sure how that was theorizing as there was no theory, it was just definition of words.

V_Translanka

  • Interim Global Moderator
  • Arbiter (+8000)
  • *
  • Posts: 8340
  • Destroyer of Worlds
    • View Profile
    • http://www.angelfire.com/weird2/v_translanka/
Why Crono?
« Reply #259 on: August 07, 2005, 08:46:50 am »
Quote from: Funk & Wagnalls Standard Desk Dictionary
debate n. 1. A discussion of any question; argument; dispute. 2. A formal contest in argumentation conducted between persons taking opposite sides of a question.


Quote from: Funk & Wagnalls Standard Desk Dictionary
theory n. 1. A plan or scheme existing in the mind only; a speculative or conjectural view of something. 2. An integrated group of the fundamental principles underlying a science or its practical applications: the atomic theory. 3. Abstract knowledge of any art as opposed to the practice of it. 4. A closely reasoned set of propositions, derived from and supported by established evidence and intended to serve as an explanation for a group of phenomena: the quantum theory.


Hm...Now I have more words to put in my Compendium Dictionary! Yes!

kazmaka

  • Enlightened One (+200)
  • *
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #260 on: August 07, 2005, 09:05:41 am »
okay well ive always been taught an argument is not a debate, cos people just argue, and go roar, which is basically what were doing, janus is a diferent person, roar no hes not, roar yes he is, roar no hes not, for petes sake man yes is! dam u fool im telling you hes not!! well i dont give a dam cos im telling u he is!!!! well if your not gona give a dam then screw it niether will i, no hes not!

yeh got a bit carried away, but okay whatever u say translanka, im off to go play sum cross so no time for more arguing/debating.

Zaperking

  • Radical Dreamer (+2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 2210
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #261 on: August 07, 2005, 10:22:51 am »

Owned.

Legend of the Past

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1679
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #262 on: August 07, 2005, 12:04:30 pm »
Quote from: Zaperking

Owned.


I'd say. XD

kazmaka

  • Enlightened One (+200)
  • *
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #263 on: August 07, 2005, 12:35:39 pm »
fair point.

Sentenal

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1948
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #264 on: August 07, 2005, 02:16:25 pm »
Wow, if hes telling me not to be retarted, its him crying that I some how started a fight.  The comendium has really fallen.

Personality changing does not make you a different person.  Just though you might want to know.  I'm the same person I was when I was a kid.  I can't see how you can look at that definition and say Magus was being literal.  Because he is the same distinct entity as Janus.

Why am I even bothering?

kazmaka

  • Enlightened One (+200)
  • *
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #265 on: August 07, 2005, 02:33:32 pm »
i have no idea, janus cannot posibly grow up to magus without lavos's intervention chucking him 400 years in the future, what you said is completely irelevant.

Sentenal

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1948
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #266 on: August 07, 2005, 02:38:34 pm »
Quote from: kazmaka
i have no idea, janus cannot posibly grow up to magus without lavos's intervention chucking him 400 years in the future, what you said is completely irelevant.


lol

This is getting funny.  There is not a timeline where the Janus is not sent to 600ad.  It happend in the Original Timeline.  I cannot possible grow up to who I am now if my family hadn't moved to a new how when I was young </sarcaism>.

kazmaka

  • Enlightened One (+200)
  • *
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #267 on: August 07, 2005, 02:54:22 pm »
Quote from: Sentenal
This is getting funny.  There is not a timeline where the Janus is not sent to 600ad.  It happend in the Original Timeline.


erm i never said there was.

Quote from: Sentenal

I cannot possible grow up to who I am now if my family hadn't moved to a new how when I was young </sarcaism>.


have you ever been thrown 400 years into the future? no.[/quote]

Sentenal

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1948
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #268 on: August 07, 2005, 02:59:23 pm »
Quote from: kazmaka
Quote from: Sentenal
This is getting funny.  There is not a timeline where the Janus is not sent to 600ad.  It happend in the Original Timeline.


erm i never said there was.

Quote from: Sentenal

I cannot possible grow up to who I am now if my family hadn't moved to a new how when I was young </sarcaism>.


have you ever been thrown 400 years into the future? no.
[/quote]

Then whats YOUR point?  Getting thrown into the future magically makes a person ceise to exist, and the magically become someone else?  The fact that Lavos interfered it irrelevant.

kazmaka

  • Enlightened One (+200)
  • *
  • Posts: 261
    • View Profile
Why Crono?
« Reply #269 on: August 07, 2005, 03:11:27 pm »
ive said my point many times, if youve forgot already i advise you read this entire pointless argument, for i refuse to call it a debate, all over again.